<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accord welcomes RE review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanistlife.org.uk/2010/07/accord-welcomes-re-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanistlife.org.uk/2010/07/accord-welcomes-re-review/</link>
	<description>Humanist perspectives on the here and now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Salter</title>
		<link>http://www.humanistlife.org.uk/2010/07/accord-welcomes-re-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Salter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanistlife.org.uk/?p=3530#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>Teaching in a balanced and critical way about the variety of human beliefs past and present is surely an educational necessity.  Pragmatically, without it (and USA, Turkey &amp; India are hardly encouraging examples) children are at the mercy of family prejudices and the divisive absolutisms of faith.
But SACREs (mine here comprises about 25 people from 4 groups - Cof E, all other religious, teachers, local authority) exist precisely to provide an RE syllabus linked to religious power.   These baggy self-serving bureaucracies  enable faults such as automatic enrolment in examinations where the only comparative element required is within Christianity, and the favouring of a covert evangelism.
The beliefs and morality of ordinary life and the right of children to grow toward independent belief should be recognised, otherwise &quot;if it&#039;s not our faith it doesn&#039;t count&quot;.  Better perhaps to stand apart from such nonsense than to legitimise it by seeking token admission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teaching in a balanced and critical way about the variety of human beliefs past and present is surely an educational necessity.  Pragmatically, without it (and USA, Turkey &amp; India are hardly encouraging examples) children are at the mercy of family prejudices and the divisive absolutisms of faith.<br />
But SACREs (mine here comprises about 25 people from 4 groups &#8211; Cof E, all other religious, teachers, local authority) exist precisely to provide an RE syllabus linked to religious power.   These baggy self-serving bureaucracies  enable faults such as automatic enrolment in examinations where the only comparative element required is within Christianity, and the favouring of a covert evangelism.<br />
The beliefs and morality of ordinary life and the right of children to grow toward independent belief should be recognised, otherwise &#8220;if it&#8217;s not our faith it doesn&#8217;t count&#8221;.  Better perhaps to stand apart from such nonsense than to legitimise it by seeking token admission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.humanistlife.org.uk @ 2012-02-10 07:19:23 -->
